You're contacting media contact of this press release

Title: Why Crypto Wallet Trust Is Built on Transparency, Not Promises: The Challenge of Defining Trust in a Decentralized System

Trust has always been a complicated concept in cryptocurrency. Designed to remove reliance on centralized institutions, blockchain technology replaced intermediaries with code. Yet as crypto adoption has expanded, users have found themselves navigating a landscape filled with wallets, platforms, and tools that all claim to be secure, reliable, and trustworthy—often without a clear basis for comparison.Unlike traditional finance, crypto does not operate under a shared custody or security framework. There is no universal authority certifying wallet safety, no standardized audit requirement, and no global rulebook defining best practices. As a result, trust in crypto storage is shaped less by formal guarantees and more by how transparently providers communicate their role and limitations.Why Traditional Trust Models Fall Short in CryptoIn banking, trust is enforced through regulation, insurance, and institutional oversight. Customers expect protections because systems exist to enforce accountability. Crypto operates differently. Asset ownership is determined by access to private keys, not by account credentials or institutional records.This structural difference makes traditional trust models difficult to apply. A wallet provider does not “hold” assets in the same way a bank does, particularly in self-custody systems. Instead, the provider offers software that enables users to interact with decentralized networks. The responsibility for access, security, and recovery often rests with the individual.This reality has led to confusion, especially among newer users who may assume that all wallets function like traditional financial services.The Growing Importance of Custody AwarenessCustody has become one of the most critical concepts in crypto ownership. Custodial platforms m...

This press release is issued by King Newswire